BREMER MEETS K-LO

An American in Baghdad
L. Paul Bremer III on his Year in Iraq.

Q&A by Kathryn Jean Lopez
January 10, 2006, 9:00 a.m.
NRO

KATHRYN JEAN LOPEZ:Ambassador Bremer, from before the time you landed on Iraqi soil you were concerned we didn't have enough troops there. You write that in July 2003 you told Condi Rice "the Coalition's got about half the number of soldiers we need here and we run a real risk of having this thing go south on us." You had made this point to Don Rumsfeld and to the president, among others. So why do you believe it was that you never got 'em?

L. PAUL BREMER III: Look, the secretary of Defense and the president have lots of advisers around them, including the Joint Chiefs of Staff and others, who are military experts. They reported that the military commanders on the ground said they had enough troops to accomplish their missions. And some in our military believed that having additional troops would exacerbate the situation. I respected their view, but disagreed. I felt that our fundamental responsibility was to provide law and order and that by not stopping the looting right after Liberation, we gave the Iraqis, including the insurgents, the impression we were not prepared to be tough with law-breakers.

LOPEZ: You're especially critical of the Pentagon in the book, but also of the president. What's the point of pointing your finger at still-in-place leaders while we're still at war?

I see. Once we are at war, all criticism must cease.