Ramesh Ponnuru at NRO thinks it's good:
I do think the Robertson endorsement is a big plus for Giuliani.
John Podhoretz writing in Commentary thinks it's mixed:
Taken strictly as an electoral matter, the Robertson imprimatur is almost certainly a wash — meaning that any votes it will generate will be offset by votes it will cost among those, even on the Republican side, who find Robertson a singularly unappetizing figure (including among Evangelical Christians, many of whom come from a different eschatalogical tradition from Robertson’s).
Tammy Bruce, noted FAUX News political analyst, writes that it's bad:
Robertson is like a Fred Phelps Lite who condemns people on television instead of at funerals.
Overall, this is another reason to oppose Giuliani and it shows that the wingnuts are in disarray.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment