Time's Mark Halperin declared it "disastrous" and a "failure." According to Halperin, Clinton was "shrill" and "too hot tempered." The Politico's Roger Simon agreed that Clinton "really" had a "bad night" -- but Simon insisted that Clinton "seemed largely emotionless and detached." Given that two such esteemed journalists agreed that Clinton had a horrible night, but did so based on directly contradictory reasons, it's easy to suspect that no matter what Clinton had done during the debate, the pundits would have criticized her.
Monday, November 12, 2007
RASHOMON OR POLITICAL ANALYSIS?
Jamison Foser of Media Matters noted this contradiction between two nationally-known pundits:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment