I never understood why the PUMAs were so angry and now I might have come across an answer. Glenn Greenwald recently interviewed Jonathan Weiler about a book he co-authored, Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics. It turns out that a persons level of authoritarianism was predictive of who would support Hilary instead of Obama:
We're talking about an entirely Democrat electorate, or mostly Democrat electorate, some independents also, and so partisanship is itself not really at play there. And yet we found an incredibly powerful relationship between authoritarianism and whether you voted for Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama. Specifically, the nonauthoritarians were very drawn to Obama, and authoritarians were very drawn to Hillary, especially after she started really playing up, directly or indirectly, her beer-drinking, white persona.
No comments:
Post a Comment