10. We note here that we are statisticians/mathematicians who were asked to comment on the correctness of the methodology found in MBH98/99. In this report we have focused on answering this question and not on whether or not the global climate is changing. We have discussed paleoclimatology only to the extent that it was necessary to make our discussion of the statistical issues clear. The instrumented temperature record makes it clear that global temperatures have risen since 1850 CE. How this present era compares to previous epochs is not clear because the uncertainties in the proxies. However, it is clear that average global temperature increases are not the real focus. It is the temperature increases at the poles that matter and average global or Northern Hemisphere increases do not address the issue. We note that according to experts at NASA’s JPL, the average ocean height is increasing by approximately 1 millimeter per year, half of which is due to melting of polar ice and the other half due to thermal expansion. The latter fact implies that the oceans are absorbing tremendous amounts of heat, which is much more alarming because of the coupling of ocean circulation to the atmosphere. (See Wunsch 2002, 2006).
Monday, November 30, 2009
WHAT PROF. WEGMAN, ET. AL., WROTE IN 2006
The man-made global warming denialists, like Mark Levin, cite the review by Wegman, Scott and Rice of some of the paleo-climate work of Michael Mann. In addition to the statistical errors they found in Mann's work, they also offered this as one of their conclusions:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment