At least on health care, F. A. Hayek is vastly superior to the reactionary Von Mises. This passage is from The Road to Serfdom, page 125:
Nor is there any reason why the state should not assist individuals in providing for those common hazards of life against which, because of their uncertainty, few individuals can make adequate provision. Where, as in the case of sickness and accident, neither the desire to avoid such calamities nor the efforts to overcome their consequences are as a rule weakened by the provision of assistance, where, in short, we deal with genuinely insurable risks, the case for the state helping to organise a comprehensive system of social insurance is very strong. There are many points of detail where those wishing to preserve the competitive system and those wishing to supersede it by something different will disagree on the details of such schemes; and it is possible under the name of social insurance to introduce measures which tend to make competition more or less ineffective. But there is no incompatibility in principle between the state providing greater security in this way and the preservation of individual freedom.
2 comments:
Ironically...
http://www.pensitoreview.com/2008/07/16/drron-paul-campaign-mgr-dies-uninsured/
That's almost perfect. Thanx for the tip!
Post a Comment