Wednesday, February 09, 2011

WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE?

By law, Supreme  Court Justice Clarence Thomas is require to report his wife's income, something he neglected to do for years.   Brad Friedman has been asking why there isn't an outrage about this and I am also surprised.  I don't like to frame these issues with an "imagine if it were a liberal" but you can just imagine:
"If it were Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg not reporting a million dollars from working for ACORN, the right wing would be all over it and so would the press -- until someone from the Department of Justice agreed to prosecute. The right wing, and eventually the media, would say that Ginsburg should have known the rule of law; they'd be all over her for receiving 'special treatment,' and she'd be gone in a week."
I used LexisNexis to search for "Clarence Thomas" and "disclosure" over the last month and omitting letters to the editor, this is all I found:
Results
LACK OF DISCLOSURE SHOULD BE PURSUED
St. Petersburg Times (Florida), January 27, 2011 Thursday, NATIONAL; TIMES EDITORIALS; Pg. 14A, 361 words

Justice Thomas' problem
Chattanooga Times Free Press (Tennessee), January 26, 2011 Wednesday, FREE PRESS; Pg. B9, 294 words

Clarence Thomas' strange oversight
The Roanoke Times (Virginia), January 26, 2011 Wednesday, Editorial; Pg. A16, 374 words

Justice Thomas Amends Financial Disclosures
The Frontrunner, January 25, 2011 Tuesday, WASHINGTON NEWS, 85 words

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Thomas amends financial disclosures
Lawyers Weekly USA, January 25, 2011 Tuesday, NEWS, 305 words, Kimberly Atkins

Thomas Cites Failure To Disclose Wife's Job
The New York Times, January 25, 2011 Tuesday, Section A; Column 0; National Desk; Pg. 16, 560 words, By ERIC LICHTBLAU

Thomas adds wife's employment to disclosure report
The Associated Press, January 24, 2011 Monday 08:12 PM GMT, WASHINGTON DATELINE, 136 words

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas fails to report wife's pay, group says
Monterey County Herald (California), January 24, 2011 Monday, NATIONAL, 601 words, By KIM GEIGE.R Tribune Washington Bureau

Protect Our Elections Asks DOJ to Prosecute Justice Thomas for Repeated False Statements Under Oath
PR Newswire, January 24, 2011 Monday 11:14 AM EST, 369 words

Thomas: Wife's pay omitted 'inadvertently'
UPI, January 24, 2011 Monday 9:29 PM EST, 299 words

Thomas adds wife's employment to disclosure report
Associated Press Online, January 24, 2011 Monday 8:12 PM GMT, WASHINGTON DATELINE, 136 words

Justice failed to disclose wife's income, group says
The Augusta Chronicle (Georgia), January 22, 2011 Saturday, NEWS; Pg. A10, 539 words, Tribune Washington Bureau

Group targets Thomas again; A watchdog says the Supreme Court justice failed to report his wife's income.
Los Angeles Times, January 22, 2011 Saturday, LATEXTRA; National Desk; Part AA; Pg. 1, 633 words, Kim Geiger

Group says Thomas failed to report income
UPI, January 22, 2011 Saturday 1:54 PM EST, 195 words

Campaign finance ruling: Should Supreme Court justices have recused themselves?; The liberal group Common Cause asks the Justice Department to investigate whether Supreme Court Justices Scalia and Thomas should have stepped aside in a major campaign finance reform case a year ago.
The Christian Science Monitor, January 20, 2011 Thursday, 841 words, Warren Richey Staff writer

No comments: