David Brooks flew to London so now he's an expert on British politics, and in his New York Times column this morning, he explains why "the British political system is basically functional while the American system is not." Here's the crux of what makes their system so admirable in his eyes:Brooks is simply advocating a modern, non-hereditary version of Edmund Burke's rule of the elite.
Britain is also blessed with a functioning political culture. It is dominated by people who live in London and who have often known each other since prep school. This makes it gossipy and often incestuous. But the plusses outweigh the minuses.It has long been the supreme fantasy of establishment guardians in general, and David Brooks in particular, that American politics would be dominated by an incestuous, culturally homogeneous, superior elite "who live in [Washington] and who have often known each other since prep school."
Tuesday, May 24, 2011
DAVID BROOKS CHANNELS EDMUND BURKE
Atrios points out that David Brooks really does want the Villagers to rule America and Glenn does a full post-mortem of Brooks' latest babbling which includes this key observation:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Brooks was born in Toronto, Canada and grew up in New York City in Stuyvesant Town. He graduated from Radnor High School (located in a Main Line suburb of Philadelphia) in 1979. He graduated from the University of Chicago in 1983 with a degree in history.[1]
Don't omit the New York erstwhile Levantine axis.
The University of Chicago has a LOT to answer before besides Strauss and Friedman.
Post a Comment