On pages 157-58 Schumpter notes that the calculations of Homo Economicus lead to the conclusion that having children simply doesn't pay:
Still more important however is another "internal cause," viz. the disintegration of the bourgeois family. ... To men and women in modern capitalist societies, family life and parenthood mean less than they meant before and hence are less powerful molders of behavior;
As soon as men and women learn the utilitarian lesson and refuse to take for granted the traditional arrangements that their social environment makes for them, as soon as they acquire the habit of weighing the individual advantages and disadvantages of any prospective course of action--or, as we might also put it, as soon as they introduce into their private life a sort of inarticulate system of cost accounting -they cannot fail to become aware of the heavy personal sacrifices that family ties and especially parenthood entail under modern conditions and of the fact that at the same time, excepting the cases of farmers and peasants, children cease to be economic assets. These sacrifices do not consist only of the items that come within the reach of the measuring rod of money but comprise in addition an indefinite amount of loss of comfort, of freedom from care, and opportunity to enjoy alternatives of increasing attractiveness and variety-alternatives to be compared with joys of parenthood that are being subjected to a critical analysis of increasing severity.
No comments:
Post a Comment