Saturday, May 18, 2013

CONSERVATIVE AMBIGUITY

(h/t The Hill)

On the Jay Leno Show, Mitten$ spoke about Benghazi:
But on Friday, Leno asked Romney whether he believes he might have beaten Obama in the November election if the initial narrative from the administration on the motive behind the attacks had been attributed to terrorism instead of a protest.

“I don’t think it would have changed the election,” said Romney.
This could be taken as a refutation of Hannity, et. al. but for the fact that Mitten$ was such a lousy campaigner.

No comments: