Benghazi, as I’ve written before, was not some unconnected pioneer outpost; the circumstances there were defined by a larger policy that was flawed in ways that have nothing to do with Fox News hysteria, and everything to do with issues like the use of military force (and her reputation, within the Obama Administration, as a hawk) and the need to consult Congress. And those are points worth talking about.
Tuesday, June 03, 2014
IS DAVIDSON A LEGACY OF THE CLINTON WARS OR JUST BITCHINESS?
Even Amy Davidson of the New Yorker seems to have fallen for the conservative agit-prop about Benghazi:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
1 comment:
Dreyfuss somewhat out of direct context noted that Clinton had changed her position on Berghdal release, issuing another implicit warning about her.
You object to this?
Post a Comment