Court decision overlooked
Re: the Feb. 6 column "It's time Bush critics recall terrorist threat."
Paul Greenberg writes of a succession of court decisions that in his mind justify the warrantless wiretapping of American citizens, but he has overlooked one that is clearly relevant to the issue of whether a National Security Agency shift supervisor can by himself permit taps:
"The freedoms of the Fourth Amendment cannot properly be guaranteed if domestic security suveillances are conducted solely within the discretion of the executive branch, without the detached judgment of a neutral magistrate." — United States v. United States District Court (1972).
Steven J.
Tucson
Friday, February 10, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment