Saturday, October 17, 2009

FATS JUST CAN'T STOP LYING

In his WSJ op-ed, Fats Limbaugh wrote this:
Even after informing him that some people might try to make an issue of my participation, Mr. Checketts said he didn't much care.

On his radio show, he said this:
"Are you aware of the firestorm this --" "Oh, yes, totally aware, Rush, and believe me, I wouldn't have approached you if I hadn't taken care of that. I would not have even come and asked you to be part of the group if I had not cleared your involvement with people at the highest levels of the National Football League."

THE BEST OF ALL POSSIBLE SYSTEMS?

Like their defense of the American health care system, wingers think the current version of capitalism is the best in the world. Both are terribly mistaken and a little historical knowledge would set them straight. We've had real panics since the middle of the 19th Century, beginning with the Panic of 1857, which was followed by a more serious panic in 1873. Via Atrios, I learn that Larry Summers has pointed out the increasing frequency of panics, large and small:
  • The Latin American debt crisis
  • The 1987 stock market crash
  • The savings and loan debacle
  • The Mexican financial crisis
  • The Asian financial crisis
  • The collapse of LTCM
  • The bursting of the dot-com bubble
  • And now the financial crisis that began in 2007.
  • One crisis every three years.

We need a serious overhaul of the entire financial system unless we want to become impoverished.

MORE WINGER FOOD FIGHTS

There's a special election in NY's 23rd congressional district and the candidate endorsed by both the local and national GOP leaders isn't radical enough for the movement conservatives like Bill Kristol and Michelle Malkin, so they're pushing hard for a nutbag who's running on the Conservative ticket. The WSJ suggests that this is the downside of the Tea Bagger movement because the Baggers only want right-wing radicals in office.

This may all be a replay of the early 60s when the radicals took over the GOP and nominated the electoral disaster Barry Goldwater.

THE LIMBAUGH DELUSION

Many wingers think Mr. Limbaugh speaks not only for them but also for the "silent majority" of Americans and last week, they were dealt a blow by social reality. Fats joined a group that was hoping to purchase the St. Louis Rams and after word of his involvement spread, many relevant people wrote that this was unacceptable. In the end, the head of the investment group formally gave Fats the boot.

Many of his fellow radio maggots came to his defense and Mark Levin seems to have exceeded his usual distance from reality by proclaiming last night that "Rush Limbaugh has bested his enemies."

Over at Red State, the official "private" GOP blog, the despair reached Shakespearean depths:



I'm sure the poster doesn't realize that this is true on many levels, beginning with "we are also ignorant and angry white males." This also implies that the movement conservatives on Red State, like Limbaugh himself, are nowhere near as popular with the American people as they imagine.

Friday, October 16, 2009

THIS IS AN OUTRAGE

The LA Times gives op-ed space to one of Cheney's warmongering former assistants as if that crew hasn't done enough damage already. Matt Duss at The Wonk Room does a fine job demolishing the BS from this clown.

HUFFPO RETRACTS RUSH QUOTES

Back on July 10, 2006, Jack Huberman wrote up a number of quotes he attributed to Rush Limbaugh and it turns out that a couple of them weren't said or written by Fats. With the recent todo about Fats being an NFL owner, HuffPo did the right thing and retracted those quotes.

FATS IS ALL CONFUSED

He says he loves the NFL and then turns around 180 degrees:
Mr. Spitzer, there is no question what the federal government is doing with our money, and that is destroying our economy. So now the US Chamber of Commerce is a demon, to go along with the insurance industry. The US Chamber of Commerce is now being demonized by Democrats. They have to have a villain to advance everything because they cannot sell their ideas. They had to demonize me with false, fake, made-up quotes to protect their precious little National Football League as an outpost of racism and liberalism, which is what it is.

(Think Progress has the audio clip)

THE U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE IS FULL OF REACTIONARIES

I recall that many business leaders took a similar stance to FDR back in the 30s. Not much seems to have changed, according to this Politics Daily article:
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce launched a highly political nationwide PR campaign intended to relaunch capitalism itself.

Chamber officials repeatedly suggested that economic freedom in the United States is under attack.

"The free enterprise system, which has done so much for so many, is facing great challenges," Donohue said. "There are plans afoot to weigh down America's once vibrant capital markets with excessive regulations, and to raise taxes on our most productive citizens."

Those "vibrant capital markets" almost caused another Great Depression and many of those "productive citizens" made an enormous amount of money for creating that mess.

Thursday, October 15, 2009

WHY DIDN'T THIS MAKE THE NEWS?

I was reading an article in The Hill and I came across this amazing factoid:
According to a Government Accountability Office report published earlier this year, 44 trucks and 220,000 gallons of fuel were lost due to attacks or other events while delivering fuel to Bagram Air Field in Afghanistan in June 2008 alone.

I went to LexisNexis and searched for "Bagram" and "44 trucks" since 1/1/2009 and only found a report in Senate document from a DoD's official1. A search for "Bagram" and "fuel" turned up this report and over 100 others, none in the press.

1Congressional Documents and Publications
March 3, 2009
House Armed Services Subcommittee on The Readiness Hearing;
To receive testimony on Department of Defense fuel demand management at forward-deployed locations and operational energy initiatives.;
Testimony by William Solis, Director, Defense Capabilities and Management, U.S. Government Accountability Office
SECTION: U.S. SENATE DOCUMENTS
LENGTH: 3200 words

AND THEY WONDER WHY...

we think conservatives are ignorant.

Here's another fine example from a Politico thread:
POSTED BY
POST
118 Replies
avatar for user soldotnastan

Member Since: Jun. 13, 2009

Party: Republican

Last Visited: Oct. 15, 2009 - 9:45 PM EST

#61
Oct. 15, 2009 - 8:51 PM EST
Kenney Joe: Oct. 15, 2009 - 8:44 PM EST

Soldoutnastan

No the town was named by the Russians before we bought AK in '58, I heard soldotna translates to "soldier" a long time ago.



This tool may also be a Beckster.

JUST IN CASE...

Anita Dunn, Glenn Beck's latest target, is scheduled to leave her post as WH Communications Director at the end of this year and I'm posting this to pre-empt the wingers who will probably claim that they forced her out of office. From the WaPo:
Long a shunner of the spotlight, Dunn, who declined to comment for this article, would only sign on in April as an "interim" chief, with an end-of-the-year expiration date on her current tenure.

FATS LIMBAUGH WHINES SOME MORE

Today, he tried to blame his ouster from the purhcasing group on a conspiracy by the dreaded liberals. He seems to think that the Players Association threatened to do some bad, unspecified thing to the NFL:
And the real reason, the real reason -- and there are many, many reasons that are valid, but the real reason -- that pressure was brought upon me by Sharpton and Jackson and DeMaurice Smith and the commissioner is that the Players Association is using my involvement in the Rams and this whole episode as a bit of leverage in their negotiations, the upcoming negotiations with the league and with the owners on a new collective bargaining agreement. That is what's really going on, and the Players Association... I don't know how many players know this, but Mr. Smith has let it be known that if he has to he'll bring the White House into this. He'll bring the Congressional Black Caucus into this.

Later in the same excerpt, Fats expanded the reasons for his ouster:
But those people who enabled this event -- for their own racial reasons, for their own ratings, their own fundraising, their own face time, their own business reasons -- they're going to be just as unhappy as they were before this happened.

Aren't ratings and businees reasons legitimate free market reasons?

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

NOT ONLY ARE LISTENERS NOT VOTERS...

There also aren't that many listeners and that's one of the reasons Fats Limbaugh was tossed from the group that wants to buy the St. Louis Rams. For those of you who don't listen, winger radio for at least a year has been repeating almost daily that America has the best health care in world and you'd think that message has seeped into every nook and cranny the gasbags can reach. The result of all this agit-prop? Only 15% of Americans think that way. The numbers are higher for Republicans (28%) and conservatives (34%) but collectively those groups represent a minority of the American public.

Here are the results from Pew:

FATS: "THINK I'LL BUY ME A FOOTBALL TEAM"

NFL: "No way, Limbaugh"
Limbaugh dropped from group bidding for St Louis Rams
Wed Oct 14, 2009 11:15pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Controversial conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh has been dropped from a group trying to buy the St. Louis Rams after several black NFL players objected and the league commissioner weighed in against Limbaugh's "divisive comments."

"It has become clear that his (Limbaugh's) involvement in our group has become a complication and a distraction to our intentions," said SPC Worldwide Chairman Dave Checketts, who is leading the bid to buy the National Football League team and keep it in St. Louis.

"We have decided to move forward without him and hope it will eventually lead us to a successful conclusion," Checketts said in an emailed statement.

Today, Limbaugh tried to strike back by attacking Rick Sanchez, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and Sheila Jackson Lee but it didn't help. His little buddy, hunchback Mark Levin, attacked the same four people on his show.

I'm delighted that the "free market" provided a little feedback to Rush about his racially divisive comments and I really enjoy the irony of wingers debunking some of the false claims made about Fats, something they didn't bother to do about John Kerry and Michael Schiavo.

This is also a little more evidence that the radio gasbags are nowhere near as popular as their zombie listeners love to think.

BACHMANN ON BENNETT, AGAIN

Krazy Michele Bachmann was on Bill Bennett's radio show and made a pitch for money to support her re-election campaign. Bennett was again obliging.

ANOTHER TAKE ON LIMBAUGH & THE RAMS

Maybe this is just another part of Fats' campaign to raise awareness about himself.

THE REAL EVIL

I'm listening to Michael "War Whore" Ledeen talk to Slots Bennett about the Great Evil that is the Iranian government and I'm thinking this is just another neo-con move to defend Israel by exaggerating the threat of Iran. The real evil currently in the world seems to be the North Korean government, which has executed 100s of thousands in prison camps and starved over a million others because of its irrational economic policies.

FATS SHOULD PAY A PRICE

Limbaugh has made a great deal of money spouting lies and spreading intolerance and that's the kind of behavior that the NFL frowns upon, so it's appropriate that he won't allowed to join a partnership to buy the Rams. The wingers think this is wrong but all they can do is point to a few manufactured quotes that are making the rounds, not the many that have been authenticated.

TWO GASBAGS NAILED

Media Matters has an authenticated list of racist comments made by Fats Limbaugh and Crooks & Liars has a list of some of the disinformation from Glenn Beck.

NO DOUBT ABOUT IT...

Fats Limbaugh is trying to market himself. He's been very active in replying to e-mail questions from news sites and has now appeared on Leno and the Today Show.

GOOD FOR LINDSEY!

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), the only remotely sane senator from South Carolina, held a town hall in which a lot of right-wing radio extremists showed up to give him a hard time. He held his ground and finally put an exclamation point on his position:
Graham returned the fire with a grin, at times shouting over his most boisterous critics and telling some who questioned his Christianity and party loyalty that their minority conservative views wouldn't succeed without the political coalitions he said are necessary to serve the majority of Americans and attract enough votes in Congress.

"If you don't like it, you can leave," he said.

This is really the only response to the the Mark Levinites who want to purge the GOP of anyone who isn't ideologically pure in their minds.

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

WHO APPROVED THIS?

(h/t Atrios)

A box of Cheerios used to contain the following statement: "clinically proven to reduce cholesterol." The FDA has told General Mills that it has to remove this because there is no clinical proof. I'd like to know who gave the final approval for those words and ask him what he thinks "clinically proven" means.

AN OBVIOUS DISCONNECT

The MOTU on Wall Street are going to have a marvelous year while Americans are facing the worst recession sinvce 1900. I think it is well past time we examine the social dysfunction that lead to this situation.
Wall Street Firms Dishing Out Record Pay
By Joseph Woelfel

NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- Employees at major U.S. banks and securities firms will receive about $140 billion in total compensation and benefits this year, a Wall Street Journal analysis has found.

The Journal reports workers at 23 top investment banks, hedge funds, asset managers and stock and commodities exchanges could expect to earn more than 20% from last year's $117 billion, while pay also will top the $130 billion in 2007, the peak year.

THIS is what happens in the "Real Economy":
Still on the Job, but Making Only Half as Much
By LOUIS UCHITELLE
Published: October 13, 2009
NY Times

But now pay cuts, sometimes the result of downgrades in rank or shortened workweeks, are occurring more frequently than at any time since the Great Depression.

...total weekly pay for production workers, pilots among them, representing 80 percent of the work force. That index has fallen for nine consecutive months, an unprecedented string over the 44 years the bureau has calculated weekly pay, capturing the large number of people out of work, those working fewer hours and those whose wages have been cut. The old record was a two-month decline, during the 1981-1982 recession.

DON'T WEEP FOR THE RATING AGENCIES

They also made a killing as the bubble was inflating. (h/t William K. Black at HuffPo)


THE CONTENT OF RAGE

E. J. Dionne writes that many people are very upset because of the bad economy and urges Pres. Obama to concentrate on creating a better economic environment for them, as if Obama weren't trying to do that. Dionne seems to draw the wrong causal link because I don't see how anger about the economy turns people into birthers, deathers, or Tenthers.

REMEMBER THE PUMAS?

Those were some of the disgruntled Hilary voters who were so upset that she wouldn't win the nomination that that decided "party unity my ass" and were threatening to sit out the general election or even vote for McCain. The website No Quarter is the clearest example I came across and I recall that on some of the discussion threads, it seemed that I was on Free Republic instead of a liberal blog.

I never understood why the PUMAs were so angry and now I might have come across an answer. Glenn Greenwald recently interviewed Jonathan Weiler about a book he co-authored, Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics. It turns out that a persons level of authoritarianism was predictive of who would support Hilary instead of Obama:
We're talking about an entirely Democrat electorate, or mostly Democrat electorate, some independents also, and so partisanship is itself not really at play there. And yet we found an incredibly powerful relationship between authoritarianism and whether you voted for Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama. Specifically, the nonauthoritarians were very drawn to Obama, and authoritarians were very drawn to Hillary, especially after she started really playing up, directly or indirectly, her beer-drinking, white persona.

LET'S HOPE THIS IS TRUE

(h/t David Dayen at Firedog Lake)

Last Friday, the Boston Globe ran a very interesting article about Afghanistan that seems to agree with the DNI memo about the relatively small number of hardcore Taliban members:
Taliban not main Afghan enemy
Few militants driven by religion, reports say
By Bryan Bender
Globe Staff / October 9, 2009

WASHINGTON - Nearly all of the insurgents battling US and NATO troops in Afghanistan are not religiously motivated Taliban and Al Qaeda warriors, but a new generation of tribal fighters vying for control of territory, mineral wealth, and smuggling routes, according to summaries of new US intelligence reports.

Some of the major insurgent groups, including one responsible for a spate of recent American casualties, actually opposed the Taliban’s harsh Islamic government in Afghanistan during the 1990s, according to the reports, described by US officials under the condition they not be identified.

“Ninety percent is a tribal, localized insurgency,’’ said one US intelligence official in Washington who helped draft the assessments. “Ten percent are hardcore ideologues fighting for the Taliban.’’

Even a war whore like neocon Fred Kagan pretty much agrees with this assessment:
“The term [Taliban] has come to have a meaning far beyond what the United States should care about’’ militarily, said Frederick W. Kagan, a resident scholar at the conservative American Enterprise Institute who is advising US military commanders.

This leads us to a possible solution:
America may pay Afghan fighters to ditch Taliban
Sunday Times, London 12 October 2009, 02:19am IST

Paying Taliban foot-soldiers to switch sides could spare US lives and save money, say its advocates.

A recent report by the Senate foreign relations committee estimated the Taliban fighting strength at 15,000, of whom only 5% are committed idealogues while 70% fight for money — the so-called $10-a-day Taliban. Doubling this to win them over would cost just $300,000 a day, compared with the $165 million a day the US is spending fighting the war.

The tactic was used to good effect in Iraq where the US put 100,000 Sunni gunmen on its payroll for $300 a month each.

Monday, October 12, 2009

THE FREE MARKET FAIRY FAILS AGAIN

(h/t Kevin Drum)

Wingers often argue that by reducing taxes on businesses we would boost the economy because they would have more money to invest and that would spur demand. The problem is that right now, businesses are seeing an increase in profits but they won't be investing.
Cost Cuts Lift Profits but Hinder Economy
By MARK WHITEHOUSE and TIMOTHY AEPPEL
OCTOBER 13, 2009
Wall Street Journal

U.S. stocks notched new 52-week highs again on Monday, thanks to corporate America showing better-than-expected profits.

In an ominous sign for the economy, much of the profit is being eked out through cost cuts. Executives say they are hesitant to reinvest such profits into their businesses. With large portions of their factories, fleets and warehouses sitting idle, some say they probably won't see reason to do so for a year or more.

That means job growth and any significant rise in business spending could be a long time coming. That creates a chicken-and-egg problem at a time when the unemployment rate is already nearly 10%: Without more jobs, U.S. consumers will have a hard time increasing their spending; but without that spending, businesses might see little reason to start hiring.

Already, the economy is being starved of investment it needs to nurture growth. Net private investment, which includes spending on everything from machine tools to new houses, minus depreciation, fell to 0.1% of gross domestic product in the second quarter of 2009, according to the latest government data. That's the lowest level since at least 1947.

Keynes great insight was to realize that without sufficient demand, there's no incentive for the private sector to invest and that's why the government must pick up the slack through deficit spending.

WHAT SEAN HANNITY WON'T TELL YOU

Sean and other wingers have been conspicuously silent about the apparent success the Obama Administration has had against Islamic terrorists and instead they try to portray Pres. Obama as "weak." David Corn has a nice set of examples of success:
* June 23: Khwaz Ali Mehsud, a senior deputy to Baitullah Mehsud, the top leader of the Taliban in Pakistan.

* July 3: Mufti Noor Wali, a suicide bomber trainer for the Taliban and al-Qaida.

* July 7: Kifayatullah Anikhel, a Taliban commander under Baitullah Mehsud.

* Aug. 5: Baitullah Mehsud, the Taliban chief in Pakistan.

* Sept. 7: Mustafa al Jaziri, a senior military commander for al-Qaida.

* Sept. 8: Maulvi Ismail Khan, a military commander in the Haqqani Network, a terrorist group responsible for major attacks in Afghanistan.

* Sept. 14: Najmuddin Jalolov, the leader of the Islamic Jihad Group, a breakaway faction of the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan. He was allied with al-Qaida.

* Sept. 14: Ilyas Kashmiri, the operations commander of the Harakat-ul-Jihad-Islami, a paramilitary organization active in Pakistan, Bangladesh, and India, and the operations chief of Brigade 313, a coalition of several terrorist outfits.

"STELLAR REPUTATION"???

Insurance company lobbyist Karen Ignagni defended the report commissioned by AHIP by claiming that PricewaterhouseCoopers was a “world-class firm with a stellar reputation.” Well, it's really just another accounting firm and that's not saying much for its integrity. LexisNexis turned up this tidbit1:
Two years ago, an SEC investigation of another big accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers,found thousands of cases in which the firm's partners and senior employees had financial interests in companies the firm was auditing. PricewaterhouseCoopers agreed to take various steps to prevent a recurrence.

And here's a little evidence that PwC isn't so good when it comes to the health care sector2:
Attorney Laura Ellsworth represents a committee of creditors that are still seeking at least $1 billion from accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers LLC, over allegations that auditors failed to disclose AHERF misconduct.

The creditors want the accounting firm to help repay AHERF's debt, but attorneys representing the firm have filed objections and denied any wrongdoing.

1The Washington Post
January 15, 2002 Tuesday
Final Edition
SEC Censures KPMG for Having Investment in Client
BYLINE: Albert B. Crenshaw, Washington Post Staff Writer
SECTION: FINANCIAL; Pg. E01
LENGTH: 475 words

2Associated Press Online
February 12, 2002 Tuesday
Settlement on Health Network Reached
BYLINE: JUDY LIN; Associated Press Writer
SECTION: FINANCIAL NEWS
LENGTH: 469 words
DATELINE: PITTSBURGH

RECYCLING WINGER LIES

On today's Glenn Beck radio show, a guest claimed that because rabid environmentalists have succeeded in completely banning the use of DDT, millions of Africans have died of malaria. I've heard this claim many times before and I decided to do a little research.

The U.S. banned DDT for most (not all) uses in 1972. One of the exceptions was the use for public health. From the EPA's site:
DDT Ban Takes Effect
[EPA press release - December 31, 1972]

The general use of the pesticide DDT will no longer be legal in the United States after today, ending nearly three decades of application during which time the once-popular chemical was used to control insect pests on crop and forest lands, around homes and gardens, and for industrial and commercial purposes.

An end to the continued domestic usage of the pesticide was decreed on June 14, 1972, when William D. Ruckelshaus, Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, issued an order finally cancelling nearly all remaining Federal registrations of DDT products. Public health, quarantine, and a few minor crop uses were excepted, as well as export of the material.


Worldwide, DDT is still in use and it is only this year that the U.N. is considering a global ban BY 2020:
U.N. seeks to ban DDT pesticide and still fight malaria
Wed May 6, 2009 11:38am EDT

OSLO (Reuters) - The United Nations announced a plan Wednesday to rid the world by around 2020 of DDT, an outlawed toxic crop pesticide still used to spray homes to fight malaria-spreading mosquitoes.

DDT is one of a "Dirty Dozen" chemicals banned by a U.N. 2001 Convention after it was found to be a toxin that can suppress the immune system. It is infamous for threatening bird populations by thinning eggshells.

But exemptions have been allowed in many developing nations because it so effective in killing mosquitoes.

THE WINGERS ARE GETTING THE IMPEACHMENT FEVER AGAIN

A caller to Billy Cunningham's Sunday show said that Pres. Obama should be impeached for accepting the Nobel Peace Prize because the monetary award amounts to a bribe and Floyd Brown, a long-time GOP operative, has a site that calls for impeachment. (h/t Lee Fang at Think Progress) Brown also started the Policy Issues Institute and its site has an ad for a cruise with prominent conservative wackos, among them former Navy chaplain Gordon Klingenschmitt. The bio for Klingenschmitt on the cruise site has this interesting tidbit:



That's right, Klingenschmitt studied at Regent University, which was founded by Fundie Krazy Pat Robertson.

OK, WHERE ARE ALL THE LAWYERS AND LAWSUITS?

I noted before that a couple of whistle blowers had testified before the HOUSE OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM COMMITTEE and LexisNexis now has the transcript1. Both of them worked at Moody's:
Mr. Eric Kolchinsky is a former Managing Director at Moody's Corporation. He has worked in structured finance for over twelve years, eight of which were at Moody's. While at the rating agency Mr. Kolchinsky focused on rating collateral debt obligations, CDOs. He has also worked at Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch and MBIA at their CDO groups. We welcome you this morning.

We'd also like to also introduce Mr. Scott McCleskey, was a Senior Vice President for Compliance at Moody's Investors Service from April 2006 until September 2008. In this role he was responsible for the organization's compliance with rules and regulations established by the SEC and other regulators.

McClesky had a very interesting comment:
Secondly, I found myself more and more frequently excluded from decisionmaking meetings concerning potential violations. I will note that this did not occur on each and every occasion but it did so with increasing frequency and in particularly important matters. This includes an examination conducted by the Securities and Exchange Commission which was handled by our legal department and by outside counsel. I was flabbergasted that I, the designated compliance officer, would be excluded from meetings with the SEC during an examination and was vocal in making this point.


1Federal News Service

September 30, 2009 Wednesday

HEARING OF THE HOUSE OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM COMMITTEE;
SUBJECT: CREDIT RATING AGENCIES AND THE NEXT FINANCIAL CRISIS;
CHAIRED BY: REPRESENTATIVE EDOLPHUS TOWNS(D-NY);
WITNESSES: PANEL I ERIC KOLCHINSKY, FORMER MANAGING DIRECTOR, MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE; SCOTT MCCLESKEY, FORMER SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT FOR COMPLIANCE, MOODY'S CORPORATION; RICHARD CANTOR, CHIEF RISK OFFICER, MOODY'S CORPORATION; CHIEF CREDIT OFFICER, MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE PANEL II FORMER SENATOR ALFONSE D'AMATO (R-NY); FLOYD ABRAMS, PARTNER, CAHILL GORDON & REINDEL, LLP; ERIC BAGGESEN, SENIOR INVESTMENT OFFICER, CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM;
LAWRENCE WHITE, LEONARD N. STERN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, NEW YORK UNIVERSITY;
LOCATION: 2154 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING, WASHINGTON, D.C.

SECTION: PRESS CONFERENCE OR SPEECH

LENGTH: 34105 words

Sunday, October 11, 2009

MARK LEVIN HAS COME TOO CLOSE TO HOME

He's using his radio show to support Jesse Kelly, one of the GOP challengers for Gabby Giffords' seat in Congress. You can get the audio here. Kelly's segment starts at 91:40. He whines about the local media being biased and said that Pres. Obama has a radical agenda. Levin: "I want us to help Jesse Kelly." This is from the show recap section:


WE NEED A MORE REGULATED NEWS MARKET

NYT columnist Nicholas Kristof pointed out that pundits generally suck but still get air time and into print. Now, President McCain has gotten on yet another Sunday news show and we are left wondering why someone who had been so wrong so many times is allowed to do more than e-mail these shows.

Maybe Walter Lippmann had a good point back in 1922:

WE PLAY NICE BUT DON'T GET ANY RESPECT

Former Sen. Bob Dole complained that a DNC health care ad mislead on his position and the WH agreed to pull the ad. OTOH, a WH advisor calls the gay rights people "really part of the Internet left fringe." Worse, this numskull goes after liberal bloggers:
...those bloggers need to take off the pajamas, get dressed, and realize that governing a closely divided country is complicated and difficult.

This is really a cheap shot and I think we should all e-mail the WH and let them know.

MORE PUSH BACK FROM THE WH

I really appreciate how the Obama Administration pushes back against the wingnut media. Aside from a handful of online sites, we've been too silent for too long.
Calling 'Em Out: The White House Takes on the Press
By Michael Scherer Thursday, Oct. 08, 2009
TIME Magazine

So a new White House strategy has emerged: rather than just giving reporters ammunition to "fact-check" Obama's many critics, the White House decided it would become a player, issuing biting attacks on those pundits, politicians and outlets that make what the White House believes to be misleading or simply false claims, like the assertion that health-care reform would establish new "sex clinics" in schools. Obama, fresh from his vacation on Martha's Vineyard, cheered on the effort, telling his aides he wanted to "call 'em out."

The general in this war is [Anita] Dunn, 51, a veteran campaign strategist who arrived at the White House in May. She has been a force in Democratic campaigns since the late 1980s and helmed Obama's rapid-response operation during his run. At the White House, she has become a devoted consumer of conservative-media reports and a fierce critic of Fox News, leading the Administration's effort to block officials, including Obama, from appearing on the network. "It's opinion journalism masquerading as news," Dunn says. "They are boosting their audience. But that doesn't mean we are going to sit back."

BTW, WHATEVER HAPPENED TO THE NORTHERN ALLIANCE?

They provided the foot soldiers that allowed us to overthrow the Taliban in 2001 and I haven't heard anything about them for a long time. I went to LexisNexis and found this article from the wingnut Washington Times.
Afghan warlords will fight if U.S. gives weapons

Jason Motlagh and Sara A. Carter The WASHINGTON TIMES
Originally published 04:45 a.m., September 22, 2009, updated 07:10 a.m., September 22, 2009

SHIBERGHAN, Afghanistan | Afghanistan's long-established warlords and tribal leaders are offering to step up their fight against the Taliban and al Qaeda if the United States sends them more money and weapons, reprising the role they played before 2001.

"If you support me, I will destroy the Taliban and al Qaeda," Gen. Abdul Rashid Dostum told The Washington Times in an interview at his northern stronghold. "I don't want to be a minister, not even the defense minister. I need to be with my soldiers. Give me the task and I will do it."

More than two dozen other warlords still hold significant power in Afghanistan. They include provincial governors Atta Mohammed Noor, Gul Agha Sherzai and Ismail Khan.

Several of these former mujahedeen, as the anti-Soviet freedom fighters were known, said they also want a shift in U.S. strategy.

"Afghanistan and its people are the only ones who can truly defeat the Taliban and al Qaeda," said a former commander in the Northern Alliance who fought alongside Ahmad Shah Massoud against the Taliban.

I'D NEED TO HEAR THIS TO BE SURE

But Michael Goldfarb of the wingnut Weekly Standard seems to have made a startling admission to Politico:
The Weekly Standard’s Michael Goldfarb says that Think Progress's focus on conservative pundits shows that its impact, if anything, is waning.

They’re a shameless bunch of lying, distorting, propagandists, which I respect, and I don’t know what MSNBC would do without them,” he says. “But I think the high watermark for Think Progress is long past.”

Matt Labash, another editor at the Weekly Standard, admitted in 2003 that the conservative media outlets like his are all about partisanhsip.

BAGGERS LOVE RECALL PETITIONS, AT LEAST IN TUCSON

The Baggers held another "rally" in Tucson and now they are also trying to recall a Democratic county supervisor in addition to Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D). There was at least one GOP big shot in attendance, Jim Click, and I wonder how many people know that he was a HUGE Bush supporter?
Rally seeks new direction for US
By Rhonda Bodfield
arizona daily star
Tucson, Arizona | Published: 10.11.2009

About 6,000 people descended Saturday on Tucson Electric Park for the Tucson Tea Party event, billed as "Tucson's Last Stand." The event kicked off with Tucson Tea Party organizer Trent Humphries expressing his own brand of hope for the future: "I love the smell of freedom in the morning."

A petition to recall U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Ariz., was circulated out of the bed of a pickup truck. Another recall effort, this one aimed at Democratic Pima County Supervisor Sharon Bronson, was collecting signatures near the entrance of the park.

Thomas D. Young, who is organizing the Giffords recall, needs 83,000 signatures by January to launch the effort, though Giffords is up for re-election in November 2010.
"Something needs to change. Even if all this does is raise awareness and get people involved, that's a good thing."

The three Republican City Council candidates were in attendance, as was Brian Miller, who is challenging Giffords for her seat. Auto dealer Jim Click was there, as was Bill Arnold, the chairman of the public safety initiative, Proposition 200.

REMEMBER BERNIE KERIK?

He was a favorite of Rudy Giuliani and was nominated to head the Dept. of Homeland Security. That didn't work out because Kerik is just another right-wing scumbag. The wingers complain about Janet Napolitano but their own leaders choose much worse people.
Kerik Readies for Trial Trifecta
Kerik, 54, has pleaded not guilty
Updated 9:54 AM EDT, Sun, Oct 11, 2009

Former New York City Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik is beginning what could be a triathlon of federal trials.

Jury selection starts Tuesday in a corruption case that claims Kerik accepted renovations to his Bronx co-op in exchange for vouching for a company that wanted to do business with the city.

The 54-year-old Kerik has pleaded not guilty.

A second trial, on tax charges, and a third, in Washington accuses him of allegedly lying to White House officials vetting him for the Homeland Security secretary post in 2004.